Broad Soft

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, 25 December 2013

"Near Zero Pricing" for Voice is Not the Problem it Appeared to be, in 1993

Posted on 11:22 by Unknown
Perhaps for every problem there actually is a solution, though perhaps sometimes the answer is not what we might prefer, expect or want. Back around 1995, I ran into one of those problems.

The context was voice pricing trends. To make a long story short, the problem was a confluence of trends that all seemed to suggest voice revenues were headed south. The process of deregulation and privatization of former monopoly networks was one such early trend.

But in addition to competition, technology trends all suggested prices would drop. Among those trends: optical fiber, microwave transmission, Internet Protocol, client-server architectures, Moore’s Law and declining microprocessor and storage costs. I cannot recall whether I believed at the time that mobile communications would put pressure on voice pricing as well.

But in 1993 the United States had not yet passed the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which would for the first time allow multiple competitors into the fixed network local telecommunications business for the first time.

Just how far the trend might go was not so clear, but suffice it to say the phrase “near zero pricing” came to mind. The imponderable, at the time, was what would become of telecom service providers if their core product--voice--actually reached a point where retail prices were very low, very close to “zero.”

The concept would reappear about 1999 and 2000, when the phrase “bandwidth wants to be free” was bandied about.

Perhaps that was not the first illustration of a business strategy based on Moore’s Law. Perhaps one might say that Microsoft, for example, built its software business around an understanding of Moore’s Law.

Specifically, that meant designing software without regard for existing hardware performance and memory limitations. “Microsoft first shipped Excel for Windows when 80386s were too expensive to buy, but they were patient,” says Joel Spolsky.” Within a couple of years, the 80386SX came out, and anybody who could afford a $1500 clone could run Excel.”

One might argue lots of firms have implicitly or explicitly made continuing declines in the cost of computing and storage part of their business strategy as well.

“Moore’s Law was baked deeply into the founding strategy  of Electronic Arts,” says Bing Gordon.

The whole point is that technology makes “near zero pricing” in any number of contexts a foundation for business strategy. The key point is not that prices actually hit zero, only that they drop so precipitously that access to computing and memory no longer are constraints to what can be done.

But that’s a problem for incumbent providers who have built substantial businesses on scarcity, either scarcity of bandwidth, processing or memory. And that was the conundrum when asking what impact near zero pricing would have for telcos.

At the time, I could think of no reasonable answer. If the revenue source telcos depended on shrank so much, what would become of them?

Remember 1993. The web browser had just been invented. There were very few Internet hosts, not to mention few users. Voice services represented nearly all revenue for a telco.

The point is that, at the time, the notion that Internet access, not to mention “broadband” access would become a significant revenue generator for fixed network service providers was simply not conceivable.

In fact, even dial-up Internet access was at such a low level it was not tracked by some firms at the time, such as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

Fixed network service providers continue to face challenges, to be sure. But the answer to the problem of near zero pricing for voice has been answered, at least for the moment. New revenues from Internet access and video entertainment, not to mention diversification into mobile services, have staved off declining voice revenues.

I couldn’t see that at the time. So near zero pricing for voice has not been catastrophic. It is a problem, but not an unsolvable problem, as difficult as it was in 1993 to foresee the future.

And that's the problem with predictions: we tend to be bound by an inability to see futures that are shaped by other unknown or unrecognized trends and developments.

                     Number of Websites in Existence

Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Seattle's Gigabit Squared Fails: Sustainability Remains an Issue for Muni Access Networks
    Seattle's Gigabit Squared  network appears to have failed, illustrating a recurring problem with all municipal or joint venture Internet...
  • Access Networks Increasingly are All About Video
    In North America, r eal-time entertainment is responsible for over  68 percent of downstream bytes during peak periods, compared to 65 perce...
  • Using a Drone-Mounted Camera to See what a Surfer Sees "In the Water"
    If you've ever seen a picture of a surfer (the ocean kind), shot from shore, you have one view of what's going on, but you can't...
  • New Report Confirms: Investment or Competition is a Real Issue for Access Networks
    The latest Ofcom report on U.K. broadband infrastructure illustrates the inherent tension between promoting investment in next generation ne...
  • Google Fiber in Provo Prices Same as Kansas City
    Google Fiber  in Provo, Utah will be priced the same way as Google Fiber in Kansas City. People will be able to sign up for free 5 Mbps down...
  • EC to Review Telefonica, E-Plus Merger: How Many Carriers are Needed in Germany?
    European Union antitrust regulators will examine deals such as the proposal by Telefonica and Royal KPN to combine their German assets, base...
  • AT&T Tower Sale Raises, Does Not Answer, Question of "Core Competency"
    What is AT&T’s “core competency?” That is a question observers might raise, in the wake of AT&T’s decision to sell its U.S. mobile t...
  • How Big a Phone Will You Carry All the Time?
    How big a device will you carry with you, all the time, like you carry a mobile phone? Samsung Mega is going to provide some real-world tes...
  • To Attack U.S. Mobile Pricing Structure, Sprint and T-Mobile US Will Have to AddressTheir Own Cost Structures
    If a mobile service provider wants to attack prevailing retail prices in a serious way, it also has to attack its own operating and possibly...
  • Market Disruption is a Game Verizon Can Play as Well
    One often tends to think that big market disruptions are caused by small, upstart firms. History might suggest something quite different. Y...

Blog Archive

  • ►  2014 (23)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ▼  2013 (476)
    • ▼  December (83)
      • New Sprint Nextel Business Offer Might Combine Fix...
      • How Much has the Internet Harmed the Telecom Busin...
      • What Device Sales Indicate About Next Era of Compu...
      • 10 things not to buy in 2014
      • Net Neutrality is Part of an Older Pattern of Tech...
      • Which Revenue Opportunity is Bigger for Mobile Ser...
      • "Near Zero Pricing" for Voice is Not the Problem i...
      • SoftBank Bid for T-Mobile US Could Reshape Thinkin...
      • Are Fixed, Satellite, Cable TV, Mobile Distinct Ma...
      • What's Upside for AT&T Gigabit Networks?
      • Some Things Won't Change in 2014
      • Cheaper to Manufacture in U.S. Than China, Firms Find
      • Will T-Mobile US (and someday Sprint) Achieve Ilia...
      • Internet Does Not Change the Fact that Most Commun...
      • Where Fixed Broadband Prices in Developing Nations...
      • 2013 Not the Year Video Subscription Business Breaks
      • The Year Broadband Access Prices Were "Destroyed"
      • Raising $20 Billion is the Easy Part of Potential ...
      • Freemium is Leading App Pricing Model
      • Rise of Ad-Supported App Firms Could Have Access P...
      • Can "Internet Access" Be More Than a Commodity?
      • Sprint, Dish Network to Test Fixed Wireless
      • EE Now Supports AT&T Customer 4G Roaming in United...
      • 4 and 3: Why Sprint Purchase of T-Mobile US Faces ...
      • Australia NBN Will Miss Target of 25 Mbps to All b...
      • Spectrum Exhaust? Not Likely
      • If Price Were No Object, Would Most People Buy iPh...
      • Could a Merged Spring-T Mobile US Change 600 MHz A...
      • Is U.S. Mobile Market About to be Rearranged?
      • Study Suggests Amazon Kindle Strategy Works
      • What Drives "UnCarrier" Success?
      • Is Utopia in Utah a Potential Investment Target fo...
      • How Important is Ownership of Mobile Access Assets?
      • The New Demand for Asymmetrical Networks
      • One Way Google Fiber Has Changed Regulator Thinking
      • Installment Plans are Similar to "Device Subsidies...
      • The Song that Eventually was Released by the Rolli...
      • Is A La Carte TV a "Farce?"
      • U.K. Consumers Pay Less for Communications, Ofcom ...
      • First Passive Infrastructure Sharing; Then Active ...
      • AT&T Essentially Will Pay its Austin Access Custom...
      • Sustainability a Key Issue for Public-Private Fibe...
      • We Forget that Transition to Optical Fiber Once Wa...
      • Why Economics Matters for the Supply of Broadband ...
      • The Fixed Network Business Case: An Illustration
      • Carriers Pursue Different 4G Business Models
      • Verizon Acquires Content-Delivery Firm EdgeCast Ne...
      • To Attack U.S. Mobile Pricing Structure, Sprint an...
      • Motorola Modular Phone Prototype "Almost Ready"
      • Usage-Based Billing Might be Good for Many Enterpr...
      • U.S. Smart Phone Penetration Reaches 63%
      • Enterprise Customers Say More Cloud, More Consolid...
      • Does the Telecom Industry have a Life Cycle?
      • Indian Mobile Market Illustrates Key Principle Abo...
      • Why Sprint is Certain to Launch a Price War
      • A Scary Bit of History
      • Video Traffic is Moving from "North-South" to "Eas...
      • Rare Earth Elements Underpin Modern Electronics, a...
      • U.S. Auction of Broadcast TV Spectrum by Mid-2015?
      • Another Cycle of Faulty Predictions and Forecasts ...
      • Regulators in Mexico, Brazil Act to Spur Competiti...
      • Two Views on Bitcoin
      • Mobile Broadband will be 81% of Total Broadband in...
      • M2M Might Represent 6% of Global Mobile Connection...
      • Chinese iPhone Buyers are Not "Average"
      • VoLTE Will Help Mobile Service Providers Shut Down...
      • New FCC Chairman Distinguishes Between "No Blockin...
      • Windstream Isn't the Company It Used to Be
      • More Trouble for 4G LTE Investment Models
      • Half of all Smart Phones Bendable by 2019?
      • Why Word of Mouth is Essential for Really Big Comp...
      • Will Change to Communications Act of 1996 Create N...
      • It's not Easy to Run a Carrier-Owned Over the Top ...
      • BlackBerry Says It Isn't Dead
      • Amazon Prime Air Will Need Approval from Federal A...
      • Most Additional Mobile Spectrum Has to Come from E...
      • Up to This Point, "New Services Revenue" Has Come ...
      • Cable, Telco, ISPs Generally Score Very Low on Cus...
      • Oddly Enough, it is Nearly Inpossible to Tell Whet...
      • Android, Windows Phone Shipments Grow Based on Price
      • Twitter More Popular than Facebook Among Users 15 ...
      • 24% of Thanksgiving, Black Friday Shopping Volume ...
      • What is M2M Internet of Things Impact on Mobile Ne...
    • ►  November (79)
    • ►  October (127)
    • ►  September (95)
    • ►  August (92)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile